Face of Winifred May Davies
Latest topics
» Why Jesus Is Not God
Mon 17 Apr 2017 - 0:09 by Karen

» The Fourth Reich
Fri 14 Apr 2017 - 14:14 by Karen

» Allah, The Real Serpent of the Garden
Tue 7 Mar 2017 - 11:45 by Karen

Sat 4 Mar 2017 - 12:06 by Karen

» Hillary Clinton (Hillroy Was Here)
Fri 28 Oct 2016 - 17:38 by Karen

» Alien on the Moon
Thu 20 Oct 2016 - 21:57 by Karen

» Martian Nonsense Repeats Itself
Thu 20 Oct 2016 - 18:43 by Karen

» Enlil and Enki
Fri 7 Oct 2016 - 17:11 by Karen

» Israel Shoots Down Drone - Peter Kucznir's Threat
Wed 24 Aug 2016 - 22:55 by Karen

» Rome is Babylon
Sun 24 Jul 2016 - 21:27 by Karen



Kosminski? Low Class Jew?

Go down

Kosminski? Low Class Jew?

Post by Karen on Sat 9 Apr 2011 - 12:38



It is now more than twenty years since the "Jack the Ripper" scares thrilled London, and ever since then the general public has believed that the identity of the murderer was never known.
This, however, is not the case. Sir Robert Anderson, K.C.B., in the course of the series of articles now appearing in "Blackwood's Magazine," states emphatically that not only is the identity of the "Ripper" known at Scotland-yard, but that if the police in England had the same powers that are possessed by the French police he would have been brought to justice.
"Undiscovered murders" are rare in London," says Sir Robert, "and the 'Jack the Ripper' crimes are not within that category.
"One did not need to be a Sherlock Holmes to discover that the criminal was a sexual maniac of a virulent type; that he was living in the immediate vicinity of the scenes of the murders; and that if he was not living absolutely alone, his people knew of his guilt, and refused to give him up to justice.
"During my absences abroad the police had made a house-to-house search for him, investigating the case of every man in the district whose circumstances were such that he could go and come and get rid of his bloodstains in secret. And the conclusion we came to was that he and his people were low-class Jews, for it is a remarkable fact that people of that class in the East End will not give up one of their number to Gentile justice.
"I will only add that when the individual whom we suspected was caged in an asylum, the only person who had ever had a good view of the murderer at once identified him, but when he learned that the suspect was a fellow Jew he declined to swear to him."

Source: The Daily Express, London, Saturday February 26, 1910, Page 1

Unfortunately, for Sir Robert, there are two incorrect statements that he has made, which are in direct contradiction with other known statements also made by him. In this article, he stated that the suspect was a low-class Jew. On information which has since been found, and placed upon this forum, A. Kosminki was described as an Esquire, or gentleman, who had sufficient income to be donating over 1 pound to the repairs/renovations of the synagogue in Castle-Alley.

The second incorrect statement is that the suspect was safely caged in an asylum, and for those of us who have read the memoirs of Anderson in his "Lighter Side of My Official Life," he stated that "Kosminski was the suspect." Again, this is a problem for him, since I have recently discovered shipping records that have A. Kosminski travelling between the ports of England and Australia between the years of 1896-1897.

So, just how much credence have you put into Sir Robert Anderson's claims? For it now might send you to the hills.

Karen Trenouth
Author of: "Epiphany of the Whitechapel Murders"
Author of: "Jack the Ripper: The Satanic Team"

Posts : 4907

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum